Showing posts with label comparing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label comparing. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 26, 2023

Comparison: Oral B Satin floss vs Glide Advance

 


These two are from the same brand, Oral-B, but are completely different. 

It's funny how everyday topics can become unexpectedly interesting. Today, I find myself discussing something as mundane as dental floss. But something as simple as dental floss can make or break your day. I want to explore the similarities and differences between these two options, Satin and Glide. It's a conundrum many of us face when we stand in front of the dental care aisle, wondering which one to choose from the many options available. 

I leave it up to luck to choose the right one, they look similar and sometimes I choose the wrong floss. It can be incredibly frustrating. It's funny how we tend to hoard things, even dental floss! But after writing out this review, I have clarity and I will toss out the Satin floss. Sometimes, letting go of what isn't working and sticking with what does is the best approach. So, it is time to bid farewell to the Satin floss and avoid those pesky bad flossing experiences in the future.


My Experiences:


Pricing:
The Satin floss is priced at $5.50 for 50 meters, whereas The Glide floss is available at $6.29 for 40 meters. While Glide may come at a slightly higher cost, it's a case where you genuinely get what you pay for, and it's well worth splurging that extra 70 cents for a superior product that provides less floss.

similarities:
both are minty but the Glide is more minitier than the Satin. (that's all the similarities I can find)

the floss on the left is Satin, the one on the right is Glide

From the picture, you can already see that the Glide is much more solid and tougher than the Satin. The Satin is too thin and flat. 

Satin

Pro-ish:

  • While it does an excellent job of thoroughly cleaning and dislodging hard-to-reach particles stuck between your gums and teeth gap, there's a notable downside. Every single time I use it, it seems to dig quite deep into my gums, leading to bleeding gums without fail. The cuts it creates in my gums can be rather painful and linger for a few days afterward. 
  • It is disappointing... even when I try to floss as gently as I can.

Cons:

  • It is plasticky, feels like a folded-up/rolled-up plastic bag, causes a weird friction between the floss and my teeth and forces me to floss harder.
  • It is flat, so the sides feel sharp. On the note of being flat, the floss always ends up folding up (horizontally) making it weaker and narrower.
  • The material used easily breaks, sometimes, it breaks in between my teeth, creating more things for me to floss out. >___<
  • The floss is too flat so you need to use it a few times to get everything out.
  • Barely minty

Glide

Pros:

  • It does a perfect job flossing, I do enjoy using it as it fits nicely in between the teeth and does not hurt your gums.
  • Does not hurt gums, it, like the name, glides smoothly and gently removes.
  • it is solid and waxy and doesn't easily give way or break.
  • the shape remains consistent/constant and the area never gives in and properly gets rid of the particles.
  • very minty

Cons:

  • Can be a little thinner than I would like it to be. Sometimes, it does not have enough strength to remove everything in one floss.
  • It can be a bit waxy and leave your fingers with some wax substance.

Verdict:


I have tried to discuss my experiences in as much detail as possible and the clear winner is Glide Advance. Although it is slightly more expensive than the Satin floss, the pros outweigh the cons. 

If you want a good flossing experience, the Glide Advance is the much. better choice :).


Tuesday, May 16, 2023

Comparison: Japanese Instant Noodles vs International Instant Noodles Ramen

 

International version

The title of this post might be strange. This is what I meant: the comparison between the Japanese version of the same brand (e.g. Nissan) Noodles and the international version of the same instant noodles.

Japanese version

If you ever wondered whether they might be different, you are correct. They are quite different. In fact, if you blindfolded me and asked me to do a taste test, I would not be able to tell that both are from the same brand. 

International version 

ready to serve International version


I've always thought that the Nissan Instant noodles we know of were the standard until I moved to Tokyo and realized they are very different. There was a day I was craving that oiliness of Nissan noodles, however, when I went to the store and bought a packet that "looked" similar enough to be the Nissan Ramen I am familiar with, but to my surprise (and disappointment)... it wasn't. 

Japanese version: uncooked

Japanese version: ready to serve



Here are some differences I noticed. 

Differences between Nissan noodles:



Japanese version International version
Noodle type baked, not fried, contains bits of dried ginger and other condiments fried, a bit of an oiliness, plain
Noodle texture thin, firm and has a heavier chewiness, thick, slightly porous and has a light chewiness, also a bit oily
Taste (broth) saltier, richer flavour and healthier tasting (similar to egg noodles), heavy on ginger taste (with noticeable ginger bits) lighter brother, everything is "well balanced" and gives you a comfort food taste. Heavier on sesame
Noodle prep time 1.5 minutes (in boiling water) 3 minutes (in boiling water)
Calories 306 calories 450 calories

It has hard to choose which one I prefer because both are good and different (in a good way). The International version is more of a comfort food, while the Japanese version seems healthier and more preferred if I want a ramen meal (for dinner). 

Which do you prefer?

For those interested, here are more photos and info about each version of ramen. While reviewing the images, I realized the instructions have changed since I reviewed these noodles (on their old packaging)... so please ignore the differences in directions (between the review and the images... I'll make amendments in a bit.)

Nissin International Version:


highlights: 
made in Hong Kong



Made in Japan



Tuesday, January 18, 2022

Comparison: Korean Facial Mists: InnisFree vs I Dew Care


After writing up my review for I Dew Care's Thirst Things First Revitalizing Vitamin C Mist Mask, I thought it would be a good idea to compare it with Innisfree's Olive Real Oil Mist


I Dew Care Innisfree
Containers Fatter, shorter

✓Slicker, thinner, taller, easy to grasp

Spray Quality ✓the spray works really well and the aim is on point.

✓the spray gives a satisfying amount of product depending on how long you press the dispenser

✓the spray also sprays vertically allowing produce to properly disperse over the face

the spray works well, but aiming needs a bit of a learning curve

the spray only dispenses a set amount each time

the spray only sprays in one small spot

Scent very light lemon scent (barely there), doesn't leave any scent on the face

strong lemon, similar to essential oil, but disappears within a few seconds

Consistency very lightweight feels lighter than water
thicker, closer to a serum
Effectiveness leave skin with a plump and moist texture
hydrates skin
Price $28 CAD ✓$16 CAD
Amount of Product 80ml 80ml



Both are very similar and does what it advertises. I was impressed with how I Dew Care instantly made my face feel so plump and moist. Innisfree's is also good as it hydrates the skin but the effects are not as long-lasting as I Dew Care's. 

Innisfree's is almost half the price of I Dew Care's for the same amount. 

Hope this comparison helps you decide on which product is suitable for your needs. 

Tuesday, September 21, 2021

Comparison: Starbucks PSL vs. McDonalds PSL

Starbuck's
Yeah for the season of Pumpkin Spice Latte! This is probably one of the few things I look forward to for Autumn/Fall every year (I dread the cold).

Traditionally, I drank Starbuck's Pumpkin Spice Latte to mark the end of summer, and this year, I learned that McDonald's is offering their version of Pumpkin Spice Latte too! (I'm not sure whether they had offered it before... though).

 To make this comparison fair, I ordered them both as they are (no added sugar, no enhancements)

Starbuck's Pumpkin Spice Latte

Starbuck's Pumpkin Spice Latte

There is no doubt that Starbuck's is a Fall/Autumn staple, so here are some impressions I have drawn up in regards to comparison:

  • has a strong bitter coffee aftertaste 
  • slightly stronger nutmeg
  • slightly thicker
  • orange looking drink

I'm surprised these were probably the only differences my mouth felt and tastebuds felt.


McDonald's Pumpkin Spice Latte

McDonald's

Honestly... when I first had my first couple of sips, my brain was confused... they are both very similar in taste with a few exceptions. 

Pumpkin Spice Latte with whipped cream

notable differences:

  • slightly sweeter
  • no bitter aftertaste
  • a bit runnier than Starbuck's
  • looks like their other lattes

McDonald's PSL whipped cream mixed

I am quite impressed with McDonald's PSL, despite using more artificial ingredients, it tastes very similar to Starbucks... if you are looking for a substitute for Starbucks, then McDonald's would be a fair choice.

Thursday, November 28, 2013

Comparing Browsers:Google Chrome Vs. Mozilla Firefox

image source: http://mashable.com/2009/09/21/web-browser-faceoff/

I was debating whether this should go in my personal blog or my reviews blog... in the end, I chose the reviews blog... so here it is:

I think they are both really great browsers, but lately, I have discovered that using Chrome seems to have more user-friendly advantages over Mozilla Firefox, here are the advantages I have observed:

Advantages of using Google Chrome:
- fast
- directly type search items in address bar to search in Google
- when zooming in and out, I know what is the percentage of the view I am viewing (e.g. zoom 110%, 150%, 80% of original view)
- incognito window (for private browsing, won't save history, cookies, etc)
- open image in new tab option (very useful)
- automatically asks to translate a page for you when it is in a different language other specified in your browser)
- Chrome's autofill is so convenient when it comes to filling long forms (while you need to click on each field in Firefox, Chrome allows you to autofill with one click)

Advantages of using Mozilla Firefox:
- plugin/extensions to view live CSS/html changes (Chrome has a similar feature, but Firefox's extensions have more options and easier to use)
- extremely stable
- lots of extensions and plugins (lots of customization options)


both are great, really (they are both the most used browsers) I use both of them, if a webpage did not work in one, I would use the other browser to view that web page. But in terms of usability and user experience, I would choose Google Chrome.

LinkWithin